Honoring the process

An essay originally published in January 09, 2006


A few months ago I was watching the mat during one of my BJJ classes at the Portland gym. We were now towards the later end of the class where we roll with each other. As I was standing on the mat, watching that everyone rolling was safe, and coaching periodically. I noticed one of the newer students off on the edge. He had only been in the gym for a few weeks and a more experienced, aggressive player was smashing him on bottom. He wasn’t being hurt, and nobody in my gym ever comes at someone else with intentions of hurting them, but he was being crushed. His arms where trapped, his head was pinned to the side, his cheeks and face being smashed down into the mat. I could see that he was beginning to have trouble breathing. I knew well every single little pain he would have in his neck and shoulders after being pinned in a position like that.

 

I am not sure he had ever been in such an uncomfortable position before. Having done BJJ for around thirteen years or so, I have been in that and dozens of other equally uncomfortable spots, thousands of times; as all of us who play this sport for more then a few years have. For him, it was, clearly, a new thing.
I could tell he was on the verge of tapping out, then he would find a way to get breath, move just an inch, and would hold out longer. A few seconds later, I knew I would see his hand ready to tap, again. He had a look of real “oh shit” despair in his eyes; part panic, part ego, and I knew that very well, also.
Then, with a fairly sudden explosion of movement, he was able to make space and bring his knees to chest, pulls back a guard, sweeps, and ends up on top of his opponent, who was clearly surprised.

 

Just at that exact instant, I observed the look in the eyes of the student who had reversed that particular position, and I saw a rush of authentic joy. It wasn’t Mount Everest, it wasn’t the Olympics, or the UFC but, for this guy, it was still a huge thing.
It is a scene that gets repeated hundreds of times a day in my gym. It goes unnoticed by most of us involved, most of the time, because it is just another day for us. It is an amazing process, nonetheless.
The old games will always be with us:
Spontaneity vs. Control
Freedom vs. Structure
Love vs. Isolation
-Tim Leary
What I realized better after that day was two things:
The first is that the rush of joy that the athlete experienced at that moment didn’t just come because of a success on the mat but, instead, that the success on the mat had served as a vehicle for a different understanding, and that this understanding was actually a certain kind of pleasure that only comes in moments where you learn something new about yourself. It is where you have discovered it, through trials and risk, and made it through to another side.
The second thing I realized is this: that I, as a coach, had little to do for that process, beyond my role in creating a safe and healthy environment that allows its frequent occurrence.

 

I have observed the full spectrum of coaches over the years and I have played from several extremes, myself. I have been that coach that demanded a highly intense practice and work ethic, both of myself and of my students, because I felt that was the only way to go.
Then, having taken that end to an eventuality, I realized that the process I had been advocating was itself not enough for me, and therefore, how could it be enough for someone else? It was the second part that caught me. From that perspective I took another extreme, which demanded nothing beyond what was casually given at the time. Sometimes it was because I didn’t want to push into the darker, self-centered side, of this particular trade, because I had personally been there. Sometimes, I was just lazy.
If you act from fear there is no way you can receive love because you are trapped in a thought about what you have to do for it.”
– Byron Katie
Most recently I have begun realizing that good coaching demands that I make no such decisions regarding extreme ends of the fascist – slacker coach paradigms. What I believe I see is that my job is just to be present, transparent, and sincere in my efforts to honor the process.

Honor the process, not create, mold, manipulate, buy, sell, trade, own, or tweak the process; just honor the process.
If I did that, the process would take care of everything else and it would do it far better than I could ever be capable of doing.
I think Joseph Campbell described this kind of journey really well when he said that each individual must follow his or her own bliss.

au•then•tic•i•ty: n. the quality or condition of being authentic, real, genuine.

I have heard people interpret that as selfish but it only appears selfish from a particularly restricted point of view. The restriction is that what you feel may bring you bliss, may also be potentially unhealthy for you and others around you. I do think that can, often, be true.

However, should we see past that stage, and perhaps no longer find those potentially dangerous habits as ‘healthy’ and lacking in joy. When we have fully realized the areas, shadows, and spaces where suffering was involved for all kinds of people, I believe we grow tired of it. That happening may very well come to you as the thought, “This does not make me happy, this cannot be following my bliss!”
After all, BLISS is a huge word. It’s loaded with all kinds of very cool sensory implications. So it spurs that idea, “Hey, it must be more than this!” and that brings about changes in the entire scene.
Changes for the good, spaces for the happiness, and much – much more.

 


Sometimes, in a dynamic individual, the whole being senses that the static situation is an enemy of life itself. That’s what drives the really creative people – the artists, composers, revolutionaries and the like. The feeling that if they don’t break out of this jailhouse somebody has built around them, they’re going to die.
They’re fighting for some kind of dynamic freedom from static patterns.”
– Pirsig


As a coach, I see our real jobs as just being there to help each individual take this journey in exactly the way they need, and for exactly the amount of time they take. No more, no less.


Recognizing fully that, sometimes, to truly help other people, we have to let them continue in a path whose outcome we may already know well. We can understand that sometimes the greatest aid you can be to someone else is to help show them how take care of themselves. While at the same time, offering a hand every time they can’t.

 

If asked how we will know when someone can’t do something, as opposed to when they just aren’t doing something, I would offer that observations from personal experience will help us distinguish between the two, and that is why coaches often get better at their trade as they age. *
*(Note this doesn’t mean they ‘should’ follow a certain path at a certain time, or if they will. It only means that others have already done so many times. We recognize it may be more likely a certain way.)
The observation made may be drawn from our own personal experiences of the process, and these are often very valuable. Those, although sometimes vivid in a different way, are not nearly as numerous as the ones we will make time and again as different students, with vastly different backgrounds, and often different agendas, engage in the process in different ways. Those experiences, if truly observed, recognized, noted, and contemplated, are in my opinion the very acting processes of evolution itself.

 

Then I remember that, going into the gym and coaching our students isn’t just another day at the office, or even a career, but rather a great privilege.
We recently had someone drop into our Portland ICC class, and this was a comment made about that experience online:
“I had a chance to work out a bit with the Portland ICC class (instructor candidate course). I had been hearing for a while what a great group this is and was blown away by the work ethic I saw. The coolest thing was all the inquiry peer-coaching going on. A lot of times people come in for class and mill around until the instructor gets everyone out on the mat. Not this group. People came in, changed into their workout gear, grabbed a partner and started working on different parts of their game right away. There were guys working boxing in one corner, other guys with MMA gloves on working striking from the clinch. There were a few guys working out some attacks from the turtle position etc. No one was waiting around for Matt to tell him or her what to do. It was beautiful peer coaching going on everywhere. I can’t tell you how cool this was to see. As a teacher, by profession, I love to see this type of peer coaching going on and I realize how rare this type of thing is. Cool stuff, Matt, you must be proud of those guys.”

 

To remain in line with that sense of sincerity I had to make sure that what I was teaching in terms of curriculum was Alive. Although I believe that is absolutely important if the trade you desire engaging in involves some form of combat or competition, (I believe all trades need to be authentic or they will fail in terms of bringing real joy) that does not mean that there is still not much more to learn, do, observe, and understand about just being present with people, in a clear, compassionate, and honest way.
This, the, so-much-more-to-learn part, that is the part that makes the “trade”. In this case, teaching people fighting skills that are meaningful, healthy, and rewarding.
I believe that understanding that, feeling it, living that, and observing that is truly what honoring the process means. I believe that honoring the process may be the most important thing we do when we wear a hat that says “Coach”.

“The joyous task which confronts an ethic of spontaneity, however difficult it may be, is quite literally to woo people out of their armed shells.”
-Alan Watts

Coaching 201 , an introduction

An essay on the of coaching done by SBGi originally published in October 24, 2005

I am on my way to Florida in a few hours. I am really looking forward to seeing all my friends and having a great time training and sharing. Much of the material I have been writing about in this blog will be taught in our C4P101class which will be held on Friday for all SBGi staff. I have a couple brief notes before I go. First, huge congratulations to our three athletes that competed MMA this last Saturday in Portland. Here is a note from Tom regarding the event:Team SBG went 3 and 0 on Saturday with EXTREMELY convincing victories by all three athletes: Andy Lukesh, Keisuke Andrew, and Thomas La Cour.All three athletes showed complete dominance while executing tight, technical games. All three matches ended with submissions via rear naked chokes. Andy’s match was 57 seconds. Keisuke’s was 54 seconds. Thomas went 1 minute and 20 seconds. All the guys did an amazing job. Keisuke was defending his title. Thomas won the Middle Weight title by beating the previous champion, Team Quest’s Scott Trayhorn.


Also, let’s hear it for the SBG crowd! ! ! You guys rocked. It was impressive to hear the support and volume that you guys made. It was truly FANTASTIC! ! ! It was a TERRIFIC night for Team SBG. Big congrats to everyone! ! ! You can check out pictures online at http://www.straightblastgym.net/gallery/album28.* * *
Second, SBGi has actually made the encyclopedia! Considering the most recent competition results, with all wins by RNC, it seems fitting : ) I have posted the info at the bottom of this entry.
Have a joyful Halloween. It’s always my favorite holiday.

 


Coaching 201:
In the last entry I talked about the core principles I use when coaching. These revolve around the three key areas of material, method, and mindset.
Regarding the material, we want to make sure we are working the core fundamentals of the skill set we are training. We want to make sure we train according to the natural order these core fundamentals arise in, and we want to understand how and why they work the way they do; by encouraging critical thinking with our students.


Regarding method, we want to incorporate the three key points: an Alive training method, an athletic environment, and a technical (read smart, read art) approach to how we workout. As I stated many times, we want to make sure we are not patching up holes in our technical game with superior attributes. Instead, we want to make sure we have a highly technical game and superior attributes; a combination that is rare, and rational.

 

Finally, we talked about mindset and I broke that down according to passion, personality, and play. Passion is the pre-requisite for most all forms of measured excellence. Personality is the driving force behind that passion, and something that should always be expressed individually and uniquely. Play, is what happens naturally when an individual is expressing his or her own self in some form of passionate pursuit.
This is, in short, the optimum balance, the optimum training environment, and the optimum learning environment.

 

Now I want to speak more specifically towards the actual structure of the class or workout. The nature of the class will be determined by multiple factors. First there is the group you are speaking to, and second there are the stated objectives of the group.
In other words, is this a group of competitive athletes all preparing for an upcoming event?
Is this a group of professionals looking for a task-specific lesson, self-defense, or fitness? Or, is this a group of athlete/hobbyists training for long-term health and a larger sense of well-being? There are all kinds of different options and mixtures.
I have listed four simple types below:
The long-term athlete/hobbyist
The time-specific athlete/hobbyist
The competitive athlete
The time-specific competitive athlete


The main point I would like to make here is that, regardless of what type of individual, and what type of class we are talking about, the coaching 101 material covered in the last entry will remain the same throughout. However, the 201 material will vary according to the different groups you train and those differences are what we will discuss now.
The long-term athlete/hobbyist:


If you run a full-time gym or training group, then the long term athlete/hobbyist will probably be your largest clientele. Anyone interested in ongoing training, but not doing this as a profession, or for a specific event, will fall into this broad category.
The first thing I want to do as a coach is make sure that the individuals feel comfortable, welcome, and safe within the gym. That has a lot to do with your own personality, and the kind of behavior that is modeled and considered acceptable within the group.

 

I don’t think it is a good idea to allow anyone to join your gym unless you are truly interested in training anyone, regardless of physical ability, age, or gender. If you are really only personally interested in coaching competitive athletes, then only allow competitive athletes. If you don’t restrict membership to the type of person you truly want to work with, then what will inevitably happen is that certain individuals who don’t meet your unstated personal criteria will enroll, but feel uncomfortable, out of place, and, eventually, unwelcome.
This is where a certain amount of introspection and self-honesty within the head coach becomes very important. Do you really want to work with hobbyists? Do you really want a broad-based community of people of all shapes, sizes, ages, and interests?
Let me be clear, I don’t think there is anything wrong with wanting to work with a very specific group.

 

What I am saying is that, as a coach, you need to follow your bliss, as well. Work with hobbyists, competitive athletes, or any other type of individual, only if you feel it is your real calling and joy.
Making sure you really want to be on that mat, on that floor and with that group, is the best way to ensure an enthusiastic, welcoming, and overall cool vibe within your gym.
Having stated that, here are a few pointers regarding coaching long-term hobbyists.
The first thing to make sure of is that there is a logical progression within your club for the individual to follow. This may mean separating beginners from more advanced athletes, and it may also mean having separate classes for people of different skill levels and different needs. This can be hard to do when your group may be small (30 or less), but it is still important to have those classes listed on your schedule.

 

The really nice part about the SBGi curriculum and training method is that really advanced athletes can, and do, work with beginners in the same class. This occurs daily within my own gym, and I know it does in other SBGi gyms across the globe, as well. That has a lot to do with the fact that we teach fundamentals in all our classes, so the distinction between beginner and advanced becomes one more of intensity, as opposed to material.
However, even though it is possible and useful to have athletes of all levels work together, due to how we train, it will still be hard to build and advance a group of beginner hobbyists if you don’t have a route specifically designed for them to follow.

 

Here is a simple Coaching method I use to help facilitate that process. Think of this as a conceptual guide to Coaching at different stages:
101 = ‘I’ method
201 =
1- objectives
2- concepts/pressures
3- games
301 =
1- Objective (or challenge)
2- Questions define the games
3- Students discover & articulate
concepts/pressures
With “I” method mixed throughout when specific techniques become needed to explain and teach the objectives, concepts, or pressures, and the inquiry method for additional structure.

 

I will elaborate on all of this in the next entry.
See you all at camp!